Objections to the Power of the Senate To Set as a Court for Impeachments Further Considered. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives.
Objections to the Power of the Senate To Set as a Court for Impeachments Further Considered. To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives.Tags: Us History Regents Thematic Essay 2014Exemplification Essay Topic IdeasSolving Ratio And Proportion Word ProblemsWinter Themed Writing PaperCalm Things EssaysFree Compare And Contrast EssayResume Cover Letter For Special Education TeacherCastle Writing PaperChristmas Day Essays
An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good.
An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty.
It has until lately been a received and uncontradicted opinion that the prosperity of the people of America depended on their continuing firmly united, and the wishes, prayers, and efforts of our best and wisest citizens have been constantly directed to that object.
It is well worthy of consideration therefore, whether it would conduce more to the interest of the people of America that they should, to all general purposes, be one nation, under one federal government, or that they should divide themselves into separate confederacies, and give to the head of each the same kind of powers which they are advised to place in one national government.
And yet, however just these sentiments will be allowed to be, we have already sufficient indications that it will happen in this as in all former cases of great national discussion.
Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution. The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared FEDERALIST No. The Particular Structure of the New Government and the Distribution of Power Among Its Different Parts. I propose, in a series of papers, to discuss the following interesting particulars: THE UTILITY OF THE UNION TO YOUR POLITICAL PROSPERITY THE INSUFFICIENCY OF THE PRESENT CONFEDERATION TO PRESERVE THAT UNION THE NECESSITY OF A GOVERNMENT AT LEAST EQUALLY ENERGETIC WITH THE ONE PROPOSED, TO THE ATTAINMENT OF THIS OBJECT THE CONFORMITY OF THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION TO THE TRUE PRINCIPLES OF REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT ITS ANALOGY TO YOUR OWN STATE CONSTITUTION and lastly, THE ADDITIONAL SECURITY WHICH ITS ADOPTION WILL AFFORD TO THE PRESERVATION OF THAT SPECIES OF GOVERNMENT, TO LIBERTY, AND TO PROPERTY. These Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated as to Have No Constitutional Control Over Each Other. They shall at least be offered in a spirit which will not disgrace the cause of truth. I shall not, however, multiply professions on this head. The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity. Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention. My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all. Periodical Appeals to the People Considered FEDERALIST No. The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments. My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast. On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. It will be forgotten, on the one hand, that jealousy is the usual concomitant of love, and that the noble enthusiasm of liberty is apt to be infected with a spirit of narrow and illiberal distrust. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties.