These two sociopolitical phenomena seem to have fed back into each other, whereby the exposure of regional difference incited the growth of Southern Nationalism, which in turn represented an exacerbation of provincial differences.
These developments led to what appeared to be an irresolvable struggle over political power between the North and South, resulting in the American Civil War. "Secession and the Southern Revolutionary Nationalist Party." This blog post is provided free of charge and we encourage you to use it for your research and writing.
The American Civil War – which tore the nation apart from 1861-1865 – has innumerable causes.
This essay, written by one of the experienced Ultius writers, reflects on the great battles of the war, highlighting how intense regionalism perpetuated the ongoing fight.
They speak of justice as the basis of political organization: in the Declaration of Independence states that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the Consent of the Governed” (paragraph 2), and the Preamble lists, among the reasons for “ordain[ing] and establish[ing] this Constitution for the United States of America,” “to ...
Mc Pherson, about eight hundred books are published on the Civil War.The provocation of regional rivalries caused by a mounting tendency towards egocentric sectionalism created conditions that were ripe for the rise of nationalist movements.Lee Benson argues that Southern Nationalism had been on the rise since the 1790s, and gained in popularity after the nullification crisis ended in 1833 (37).At the time, the nation was composed of (Owsley 54).Egocentric sectionalism resulted in the Union’s dominant section (the North) constructing a narrative where the minority (the South) was labeled as “un-American, unworthy of friendly consideration, and even the object of attack” (Owsley 55).Though conflict between Native Americans and Europeans had ebbed and flowed, its legacy foreshadowed the Civil War’s attempt to resolve a political and social dispute militarily.The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are political documents, obviously, but they do more than spell out the reasons for the break of the colonies, as a unit, with Britain and how the new nation would be governed, in terms of institutions and procedures. government would thus be held accountable not in just a practical way—via elections, whereby officials who did not serve their constituents could be replaced in a peaceable manner—but in terms of a value, an ideal.The Civil War broke America in two groups and, at the time, was the war with the most casualties and injured men.As the fight to preserve the Union progressed, so did a number of other areas, such as weaponry and artillery. 507) speak of the two regions’ respective “labor systems,” which in the eyes of both contemporaries were the most salient evidence of two irreconcilable worldviews.The collision course that led to the Civil War did not have its basis in pure economics as much as in the perceptions of Northerners and Southerners of the economies Finally, despite the enshrinement via the Constitution of an essentially conservative form of government intended to ensure a peaceful political process, the history of the United States leading up to the Civil War was a violent one.