Tags: Characters Inspector Calls EssayEssay On Elementary School MemoryMicrosoft Office 2010 Introductory Completed AssignmentsScholarship Essay Samples About YourselfEconomics Research Papers PakistanValencia Bridges To Success EssayEssays About Soil And Water ConservationCompare And Contrast Research PaperCritical Thinking In ChemistryEssays On Why You Want To Become A Nurse
We also spent quite a lot on a new CMS system and on 'loading up' more back issues, which were shown in the IJP annual expenditure figures, whereas these amounts came out of our capital reserves.
It increasingly appears that this was possibly a mistake, and that this company may be (at best) 'dubious' or there is even an external claim that it is 'fraudulent': we have therefore removed the relevant information about Impact Factors from the Home Page. They gave us an Impact Factor of 2.2; and 2.6: apparently this is based on a total of 300 published (citable) articles and 807 citations over the last 10 years (IF = 2.69 ?
): and, in any one year, they say they calculate the Impact Factor by A / B: where A = the number of citations in the previous 2 years, divided by B = the total number of "citable" articles published in those 2 years.
We have just revised the IJP website with a totally different Content Management System (CMS), which will make it much easier to alter website pages and also to upload back articles and issues.
We have now uploaded our complete back-list of articles as PDF files (from 2005 owards).
One new bit of information (especially with reference to all the 'stuff' about Indexing below), is that Pub Med Central are currently looking at our application and this might eventually result in getting an "impact factor". Either of these will be much 'better' than the people mentioned below, and (maybe) as good as (or not quite as good as) the Thompson Reuters Social Science Citation Index, and so we are still working towards an application with them.
We are also developing new Editorial Policies and would welcome your views on these: please see bottom of "Ethos" page: here.
However, we would still much prefer to be included in the Thompson-Reuters Social Science Citation Index, so we will continue working on this process.
We also discussed some themed "collections" of previously published articles that we could package together and sell as PDF Downloads - and we are still considering the possibility of putting more 'stuff' on-line.
However, we do have some new applicants applying to join - and we welcome any such applications. 1 (March 2014), is out on time and will be posted out to subscribers very soon.
It has also now been clearly established that the IJP Editorial Board really is a proper sub-committee of the EAP Governing Board - a clarity that we have been wanting for 2 or more years, This is also now mentioned in the EAP Statutes: we have again submitted a budget for the EAP's next financial year, 2014-5. We are also beginning to consider new directions and possibilities: one of which is possibly to start developing an on-line edition of the Journal, as well as a printed version: but more about this later.