Upton Sinclair gives a thorough insight into the life of an American immigrant by giving repeated accounts of the plight of Jurgis Rudkus and how he struggled to walk in the snow with nothing more than socks on his feet.He also gives an account of how immigrants lived in old houses and got taken advantage of by ruthless landlords who felt no sympathy for their plight.
Upton Sinclair gives a thorough insight into the life of an American immigrant by giving repeated accounts of the plight of Jurgis Rudkus and how he struggled to walk in the snow with nothing more than socks on his feet.He also gives an account of how immigrants lived in old houses and got taken advantage of by ruthless landlords who felt no sympathy for their plight.From this point of view alone, it becomes difficult to compare the two books because they were written with different objectives in mind.Tags: Essay Questions On The SignalmanEssay On Conflict And NegotiationSpeech HomeworkInto The Wild Essay BelongingPro Penalty Thesis StatementDescriptive Essay Topics For Grade 5Title Page Example Research PaperProblem Solving Process In Management
Both authors also have a different sense of accomplishment in delivering their points to their target audience and frankly, Eric Schlosser does a better job at communicating with his audience when compared to Upton Sinclair (Graydyl 2).
Eric Schlosser seems to have a better understanding of his facts and he seems to better understand how the capitalistic and socialist systems work.
uses a reverse approach, in the sense that, it tries to appeal to the emotional side of human beings by justifying its emotional appeal through logic and reason (an approach which often does not work) (Graydyl 2).
This is true because advancing facts via emotions is an abstract method of understanding, and it may fail to hold true in the minds of readers (once the emotion disappears).
This essay on The Jungle and Fast Food Nation was written and submitted by user Vanessa L. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Literature creates a visual representation of the universal struggle that conquers the human race.These events show the author’s focus on the plight of immigrants as opposed to the intrigues of the American meat industry., we see that, both books are very different from each other.Despite the fact that, the authors of both books were great scholars and revolutionists of their time, it is incorrect to compare the two books because they are completely different from each other.For instance from his deep understanding of capitalism, Eric Schlosser identifies that, it is difficult to change the status quo prevailing in the fast food industry but more specifically, he acknowledges that it is difficult to change the fast food culture itself (Graydyl 2).On the other hand, seems to explore only what is wrong with capitalism and suggest socialism as the better alternative.However, advancing facts through logic and reason is a guaranteed way of making people understand what one has to say and advancing emotions to supplement the fact is bound to make the information advanced even more effective.Furthermore, considering the fact that, was written to expose the plight American Immigrant workers faced when they worked in American industries.Part of the controversy was also attributed to claims that, Eric Schlosser was trying to advance the opinion that, all engaged in the business of Hamburger production and beef production did not have peoples’ interest at heart.also had its fair share of controversy because it exposed the unsanitary practices which went on in some of Chicago’s meatpacking industry; thereby rubbing all stakeholders explicitly or implicitly mentioned in the novel the wrong way.Though the books were published at different times, a lot of comparisons have been made between the two publications and consequently, a lot of similarities and differences arise as a result.However, this study establishes that the two books have very little in common.