Feldman and Weiss (n.d.) summarized them as five structural elements, which do not have to be written in a particular order.Your report should: We discussed the major differences between action research and traditional research in the beginning of this article.
You may have a better solution to your question now, due to the increase of your available evidence.
You may also think about the steps you will try next, or decide that the practice needs to be observed again with modifications.
According to Johnson (2002), even though personal thoughts and observations are valued and recorded along the way, an action research report should not be written in a highly subjective manner.
A personal, reflective writing style does not necessarily mean that descriptions are unfair or dishonest, but statements with value judgments, highly charged language, and emotional buzzwords are best avoided.
It is certainly possible, and perhaps commonplace, for people to try to have one without the other, but the unique combination of the two is what distinguishes action research from most other forms of enquiry.
Traditional research emphasizes the review of prior research, rigorous control of the research design, and generalizable and preferably statistically significant results, all of which help examine the theoretical significance of the issue.Furthermore, documenting every detail used in the process of research does not necessitate writing a lengthy report.The purpose of giving sufficient details is to let other practitioners trace your train of thought, learn from your examples, and possibly be able to duplicate your steps of research.Action research is any research into practice undertaken by those involved in that practice, with the primary goal of encouraging continued reflection and making improvement.It can be done in any professional field, including medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and education.Action research, with its emphasis on the insider’s perspective and the practical significance of a current issue, may instead allow less representative sampling, looser procedures, and the presentation of raw data and statistically insignificant results.The components put into an action research report largely coincide with the steps used in the action research process.Instead of using the formal style of scientific research, you may find it more suitable to write in the first person and use a narrative style while documenting your details of the research process.However, this does not forbid using an academic writing style, which undeniably enhances the credibility of a report.Take education as an example: It is both regrettable and regressive if every teacher, no matter how professional he or she might be, only teaches in the way they were taught and fails to understand what their peer teachers know about their practice. She gained a Ph D in neurolinguistics after completing her Bachelor’s degree in psychology and linguistics.Writing an action research report provides you with the chance to reflect upon your own practice, make substantiated claims linking research to action, and document action and ideas as they take place. She strives to utilize her knowledge to translate brain research findings into practical classroom instruction.